Megat Panjialam

. إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الَّذِينَ يُقَاتِلُونَ فِي سَبِيلِهِ صَفّاً كَأَنَّهُم بُنيَانٌ مَّرْصُوص 61.4. Sesungguhnya Allah menyukai orang yang berperang dijalan-Nya dalam barisan yang teratur seakan-akan mereka seperti suatu bangunan yang tersusun kokoh.

Showing posts with label Tony Pua.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tony Pua.. Show all posts

Monday, April 3, 2017

PM: 1MDB has cleared its bank debts, short-term debts




Fact News

In the age of ‘Fake News’ making its way in the minds of many, facts are often denied even amongst the educated and professional lot through the advancement of ICT technology.

One instance is the financial position of the strategic investment company 1MDB, which was turned from actual commercial problems into scandalous by very irresponsible Malaysians, especially the Opposition.

Malaysiankini story from Parliament this morning:


PM: 1MDB has cleared its bank debts, short-term debts

30 Mar 2017, AM 11:01 (Updated 30 Mar 2017, PM 12:01)
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak has said 1MDB, which has incurred debts up to RM50 billion as of January 2016, has cleared all its bank debts and short-term debts.
“For now, 1MDB does not have any bank debt and short-term debt,” said Najib, in his capacity has finance ministry, said in a written parliamentary reply yesterday.
According to the ministry, 1MDB made the following repayments:
Paid off RM229.5 million revolving credit facility to Affin Bank in full by Nov 23, 2015.
Cleared RM950 million standby credit to the government in full by March 31, 2016.
Repaid RM2 billion term loan facility to Marstan Investment NV by April 8, 2016.
Cleared US$150 million term financing facility with EXIM Bank by April 15, 2016.
Najib was responding to Er Teck Hwa (DAP-Bakri) who requested the updated figures on 1MDB’s staff, cash flow, debts and assets.
“Due to the ongoing rationalisation plan of 1MDB, there are no new assets acquired (by the state-owned firm) in the country and overseas, in 2015 and 2016,” added the prime minister.
Under the 1MDB rationalisation plan, Najib noted that 1MDB has reduced its staff strenght from 35 as of Dec 31, 2015 to 17 staff as of Dec 31, 2016.
“By selling off the Edra Global Energy Bhd’s asset, Syarikat Bandar Malaysia Sdn Bhd’s equity and the land for the Tun Razak Exchange project, 1MDB acquired RM10.97 billion in 2015 and 2016,” he added.
According to Public Accounts Committee’s (PAC) report on 1MDB, the state-owned fund’s debt has increased ten time from RM5 billion in 2009 to RM50 billion in 2016.
1MDB was reportedly had paid RM3.3 billion in interest from April 2013 to March 2015.
1MDB, which had asset valued at RM53 billion as of January 2016, had since stripped various assets and equity stakes to clear off its debts.
https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/377487
************
And NST story:


1MDB now debt-free: Finance Ministry

By Nik Imran Abdullah – March 30, 2017 @ 12:17pm
KUALA LUMPUR: The 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) fund is now debt-free, as it has repaid in full all its bank loans amounting to almost RM4 billion, the Dewan Rakyat was told today.
The Finance Ministry said the debts, including a standby credit facility from the federal government, were paid in 2015 and 2016.
“As of now, 1MDB does not owe anything to banks, nor has short-term debts,” the ministry said in a written reply to Er Teck Hwa (DAP-Bakri).
The ministry said 1MDB made full settlement, amounting to RM229.5 million, for a revolving credit facility to Affin Bank, on Nov 23, 2015.
On March 31, 2015, 1MDB paid the full amount of RM950 million to the federal government for a standby credit facility.
On April 8, last year, RM2 billion was paid to Marstan Investments N.V. for a term loan facility.
On April 15, last year, 1MDB paid in full a term-financing facility amounting to US$150 million to EXIM Bank.
The ministry also said 1MDB had raised cash amounting to RM10.97 billion through sales of assets in Edra Global Energy Bhd, part of equities in Bandar Malaysia Sdn Bhd, and land for the Tun Razak Exchange project in 2015 and last year.
As the rationalisation plan of 1MDB is ongoing, no new assets were acquired in 2015 and last year,” the ministry said.
In line with the plan, the ministry said the number of 1MDB employees is 17 as of Dec 31, last year, down from 35 staff on Dec 31, the previous year.
**************
Prime Minister Dato’ Sri Mohd. Najib Tun Razak acting as the Minister of Finance responded to a DAP MP’s querry, through a written reply in the Dewan Rakyat.

The Opposition since 2012 made the 1MDB the most controversial and later contentious issues ever thrown against a corporation owned by the Malaysian Government, which was supposed to implement strategic programs such as high end property and energy sectors.

Despite explanations made, even on formal platforms such as replies in the Parliament, the Opposition to continue to make the 1MDB issue continue to be contentious.

Second Finance Minister Dato’ Sri Johari Abdul Ghani did offer detailed explanation on 1MDB, as a response to DAP Strategic Director Tony Pua’s dramatised ‘Open Letter’.
COMMENT I refer to a press statement issued today by YB Tony Pua.
YB Tony Pua is well-versed in the facts concerning 1MDB, given he is a member of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Thus, it is disappointing to note that he has chosen to misrepresents the facts and has accused me of lying, in his desperate attempts to mislead the rakyat.
The matter at hand is clear, simple and has been publicly explained, as evidenced in page 81 of the PAC Report on 1MDB.
The facts are as follows:
1. The TRX and Bandar Malaysia lands were originally owned directly by the government. The government made a decision to sell the lands in 2010 and 2013 respectively, to 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a holding company 100 percent owned by MOF Inc. 1MDB in turn owned the lands via its 100 percent equity shareholding in two subsidiary companies, ie TRX City Sdn. Bhd. (TRXC) and Bandar Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (BMSB).
2. It is clear that from the above transactions, the government ownership of the lands shifted from direct to indirect ownership, via MOF Inc ultimate ownership of 1MDB and its subsidiary companies.
3. Although the Bandar Malaysia land was sold at a nominal sum to BMSB, there was a responsibility to construct/upgrade six bases for the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) and two bases for the Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM), for a total development cost of RM 2.7 billion, of which 1MDB had to contribute RM1.6 billion.
4. Although the TRX land was sold at a nominal sum to TRXC, there was a responsibility to construct infrastructure not only in TRX but also in the surrounding areas, including a vehicular tunnel under Jalan Tun Razak, for a total sum of approximately RM 3 billion.
5. TRXC and BMSB undertook debts of RM 800 million and RM2.4 billion respectively, to undertake the construction of infrastructure and the six air force/two police bases referred to above. These debts were always attached to the said land when these two companies raised their financing and thus form part of the security for the said debts. In other words, it is an operating debt of these two companies.
6. With the infrastructure development and planning approvals obtained by TRXC and BMSB from 2010/2013 to the present day, the value of the TRX and Bandar Malaysia lands have increased in value significantly.
6. The PAC recommended in April 2016 that MOF Inc take over direct ownership of Bandar Malaysia and TRX lands from 1MDB. The most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve this is via a transfer of TRXC and BMSB shares to MOF Inc. So, instead of owning those companies via 1MDB, MOF Inc will directly own BMSB and TRXC, along with all the assets and the operating debts of the respective companies.
7. The TRXC and BMSB debts will be repaid by future cashflows of these companies as described in page 81 of the PAC Report. Further, whilst TRXC will continue to be 100 percent owned by MOF Inc, it is pertinent to note that a sale and purchase agreement has been executed with a consortium for the sale of 60 percent equity shareholding in BMSB.
8. More importantly, page 81 of the PAC Report also makes clear that the debts that will remain on the balance sheet of 1MDB are the RM 5 billion sukuk, the US$3.0 billion bond and the 2x US$1.75 billion bonds. These 1MDB debts will be serviced from matching cashflows, as described in the PAC Report.
Whilst MOF Inc will not be taking over these 1MDB debts, the substance of the letter of support and guarantee from the government, remains intact, as described in the PAC Report.
There is therefore a clear distinction between 1MDB debts, which will not be taken over by MOF Inc, and the BMSB/TRXC project company operating debt, which are part of the assets and liabilities of the company and which will be serviced from the project cash-flows.
JOHARI ABDUL GHANI is Second Finance Minister.
https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/375939
**********
1MDB was made contentious when Fourth Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad openly attacked Prime Minister Najib exactly two year ago this month. His baseless accusations then “1MDB lost RM42 billion!”.

Tagged team with foreign media which include the Neo Con Jewish controlled Wall Street Journal, a serious of reporting made without verified evidence and named sources (supposedly, ‘authorities’ on the matter), which spurred the 1MDB matter to be scandalous.

It was then clear that the 1MDB issue was an excuse to demonise Prime Minister Najib and his administration, in the strategic play to oust him (then attempts to trigger a ‘revolution’ amongst the Cabinet, UMNO Supreme Council, UMNO General Assembly and eventually Parliament through a vote of no confidence).

However, it failed all the way.

Aides of Dr. Mahathir even went overseas to lodge reports to the authorities in Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States based on so called ‘evidence’, which many are not properly verified and speculative and some are even fabricated.

MOF II Johari also said in Parliament two weeks ago 1MDB is the most investigated corporation in the Malaysian history. So far except for being reprimanded for flogging bureaucratic regulations, no personalities from the strategic investment corporation have yet to be charged because lack of implicating evidence.

Despite all of these reports and complaints lodged all over the world the past two years, there is no progress on the investigations which implicated 1MDB in any criminal activities.

Yet, parties attempting hard to demonise Prime Minister Najib and his administration such as Dr. Mahathir, the Opposition and foreign media been using terms such as “Kleptocracy”.

The fact remains that 1MDB is a corporation which embarked on various diversified tracks faced commercial issues. 



Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Tony "Bugs Bunny" Pua jutawan penipu | Jual Syarikat di Singapura Kerana Rugi


Pendedahan terbaru Cyberlake yang dahulunya milik Tony Pua yang dipuja oleh penyokong DAP serta menganggap dirinya Pakar Ekonomi.

Saya akan buat  pendedahan bersiri mengenai syarikat ini untuk tatapan anda semua.

Tony Pua adalah satu lagi penipu. Dia telah berbohong pada perhimpunan tahunan 2008. Lihat profil di dalam blognya:
Sebelum sepenuh masa menyertai politik pada Januari 2007, saya adalah CEO dan pengasas syarikat IT Malaysia, tersenarai di bursa saham Singapura. Saya jual semua saham itu supaya saya boleh berkhidmat kepada masyarakat dan terlibat di dalam sosio-politik Malaysia.”
[Hurkkk... thuihhh! Ekkk ... menyampah aku dengar anak Cina kampung bela ayam ni bercakap. Macam real saja penyamun ni bercakap.]

Di dalam profil tersebut, Tony Pua malu untuk menyiarkan nama syarikat berkenaan iaitu Cyber Village Holding Ltd. Dia tidak menyatakan syarikat yang diuruskannya itu mengalami kerugian.

Pua tidak menyebut kepada syarikat mana dia menjual saham Cyber Village. Nama Cyber Village serta merta ditukar pada 2008 kepada Koyo International untuk mengaburi rakyat Malaysia, tentu saja, untuk mengelakkannya daripada dikesan.

Pua tidak menceritakan Cyber Village diambil alih oleh Brightsphere Sdn Bhd (co No: 804460). Brightsphere adalah syarikat RM2. Pemegang sahamnya adalah bekas kakitangan Cyber Village (Sua Shii Huey dan Shieh Yee Bing).

Malah, setiausaha syarikat adalah isteri Pua, Yow Ting Fong. Alamat berdaftar Brightshphere adalah bersebelahan dengan pejabat firma guaman isteri Pua, Chris Lim Ting ang Partners, T-109, 3rd Floor, Centrepoint, Bandar Utama (Petaling, Selangor).

Pada 2004 Pua dan Cyber Village-nya terjerumus ke dalam masalah besar dan memerlukan bantuan kewangan. Siapakah yang menyelamatkan?

Justin Leong Ming Loong, cucu kepada mendiang Tan Sri Lim Goh Tong dari Genting. Justin Leong menyalurkan dalam S$ 3 juta ke dalam Cyber Village untuk membantu Pua.

Untuk makluman pembaca dan Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri, Justin Leong dan rakan niaganya (Gau Xiang Jun) menggunakan Treasure Valley International Limited (ditubuhkan di Virgin Islands).

Itulah Tony Pua, orang yang mengaku dirinya jutawan di Singapura sebelum menyertai Dap pada 2008.

Credit : The Unspinners

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Salahguna wang Zakat

Ini apa yang sedang hangat tersebar di laman sosial. Ia membabitkan penyalahgunaan wang zakat di negeri Pulau Pinang.
Baca apa yang disebarkan ;
Kes pertama. (Lihat Foto)
KAPITALIS KAUT KEUNTUNGAN DARI DUIT ZAKAT ORANG MISKIN PULAU PINANG. 
LIMA KES YANG PERLU DIBERI PERHATIAN
Setiap tahun pihak zakat Pulau Pinang akan mengeluarkan baucer bantuan kepada asnaf tertentu utk membeli pakaian sekolah. 
Sekali pandang ianya mmg sangat baik tapi sebalik daripada itu tahukah umat islam di pulau pinang bahawa ada sesuatu yang tidak kena di sebalik nilai baucer ini. 
Untuk tahun ini nilai satu baucer utk sekolah menengah ialah sebanyak RM170.00 dan bagi sekolah rendah pula bernilai RM150.00.
Jika di ikutkan nilai ini sememangnya sudah cukup untuk seorang pelajar memiliki kelengkapan sekolah malah ianya juga boleh di katakan boleh utk membeli kelengkapan utk dua orang anak keluarga sederhana.
Namun menurut syarat pada baucer ini satu baucer hanya boleh membeli pakaian utk seorang sahaja dan di wajibkan membeli 2 pasang baju.
Yang menjadi masalahnya ialah harga pakaian di gedung ini 3 kali ganda harganya berbanding kedai biasa.
Sehelai baju mengikut saiz berharga sehingga RM35.00 dan apabila di wajibkan membeli 2 pasang maka rm70.00 sudah di habiskan utk membeli baju.
Baki lagi RM100.00 terpaksa di bahagikan utk membeli kelengkapan lain yg juga berlipat kali ganda harganya dari kedai biasa.
Stokin yg berharga RM5.00 3 pasang di jual dengan harga RM5 Sepasang.
Setelah kira pi kira mai nilai RM170.00 tersebut hanya cukup cukup untuk menampung keperluan seorang pelajar pada hal kalau nilai tersebut di gunakan utk membeli di kedai lain ianya boleh utk membeli keperluan 2 orang pelajar.
Persoalannya siapakah yang membuat kira kira dengan gedung pakaian ini dan kenapakah setiap tahun gedung ini di beri projek pakaian sekolah ini?
Adakah berlakunya rasuah dalam pemberian projek ini di antara kakitangan PUZ dengan gedung pakaian ini?
Umat islam Pulau Pinang perlu tahu hak mereka. Wang zakat yang mereka bayar mungkin telah di gunakan sewenang wenangnya oleh mereka yang di beri amanah utk memperkayakan orang orang tertentu.
Sudah sampai masanya orang politik yang mencari kekayaan menggunakan wang zakat di terajang keluar dari PUZ Pulau Pinang.
Kes kedua.
3 orang Dato sendiri kasi nama nak jadi Dato.
Dari kanan
Dato Halim dari PKR
Dato Mus dari PKR
Dato Salleh dari Pas
Di beri amanah utk menjaga umat islam di Pulau Pinang tapi merantau ke kemboja bawa duit zakat orang miskin pulau pinang sedangkan masih ramai orang islam tempatan yg memerlukan pertolongan.
Itu belum lagi di kira kos pelancongan yang katanya membawa 27 orang politik melayu ke sana.
Apa yg sedang di tipu orang kemboja tidaklah di ketahui. Mungkin sedang menceritakan kehebatan mereka menguruskan wang zakat di pulau pinang.
Kes ketiga.
Menurut komen dalam posting aku semalam {https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1002770549764044&set=a.556159631091807.1073741831.100000933268237&type=1&theater&notif_t=like} di katakan seramai 27 orang telah mengikuti rombongan membawa duit zakat orang miskin di Pulau Pinang ke Kemboja. 
Jika benar seperti dakwaan ini persoalan yang timbul ialah mengapa begitu ramai telah turut serta dalam misi bantuan ini. Adakah ianya memerlukan tenaga manusia untuk memberi khimat kemanusian atau wang zakat orang miskin di Pulau Pinang terlalu banyak di bawa ke Kemboja sehinggakan memerlukan ramai orang untuk membawa wang tersebut.
Adakah benar semua perbelanjaan mengunakan wang zakat dan jika benar berapa banyak pula kos untuk membiayai 27 orang ini selama beberapa hari di sana? Jika seorang di peruntukan RM1000.00 maknannya sebanyak RM27,000.00 wang zakat orang miskin di gunakan untuk menampung perbelanjaan mereka.
Dan berapa banyak pula wang zakat yang sepatutnya orang miskin atau asnaf di Pulau Pinang dapat telah di bawa ke sana sedangkan masih ramai orang islam di Pulau Pinang memerlukannya.
Orang Islam Pulau Pinang perlu bangun untuk menuntut hak orang Islam yang telah di salahgunakan oleh pemimpin pemimpin melayu yang telah di beri amanah ini. Jangan biarkan wang zakat di joli sesuka hati mereka sedangkan masih ramai umat islam di Pulau Pinang sangat memerlukan bantuan untuk meneruskan hidup.
KERA DI HUTAN DI SUSUKAN ANAK DI RUMAH MATI KELAPARAN
Dari 28 pusat HEMODIALISIS di Pulau Pinang Pusat Urus zakat hanya menyediakan 2 sahaja untuk orang islam yang tidak berkemampuan mengunakannya.
Ini menyebabkan orang miskin yang memerlukan rawatan ini terpaksa menunggu giliran yang lama untuk mengunakan khimat ini.
Berbanding dengan lain lain pusat HEMODIALISIS termasuk dari gereja dan Persatuan Buddha telah memberikan khimat percuma tanpa mengira agama.
Atas alasan apa pihak PUZ sanggup melancung setiap tahun membawa wang zakat yang orang miskin Pulau pinang memerlukan ke luar negara?
Jika benar semua perbelanjaan seramai 27 orang rombongan ke Kemboja itu di tanggung oleh wang zakat berapa buah mesin hemodialisiskah yang boleh di beli untuk kegunaan orang islam Pulau Pinang yang tidak mampu?
Orang Islam Pulau Pinang jangan jadi tunggul kayu dengan membiarkan orang orang politik di kalangan pemimpin melayu Pulau Pinang ini sewenang wenangnya menyalahgunakan duit zakat.
Kita bangkit dan lawan.....
--------------------------------
Oke. 
Pertama. Aku taknak buat apa2 kesimpulan, tuduhan ataupun persepsi. Sebab aku tatau apa2 dan tak pasti tentang kebenaran kisah2 di atas.
Kedua. Pihak2 yang dinamakan dan terbabit skandal tue perlu tampil membuat penjelasan. Apakah benar seperti apa yang tersebar? Almaklumla. Yang sebarkan neh guna account facebook ori, bukan fake. Pula tue siap bagi bukti, fakta dan analisa yang complete dengan nama individu2 yang terkait pun mereka petik satu persatu tanpa cover apa semua. Dari PAS ada. Dari PKR pun ada woo.
Ketiga. Biar kita sebagai rakyat menilai selepas kesemua pihak tampil membuat penjelasan.
Keempat. Jik sungguh melakukan kesalahan dan mengaku, elok ganti balik. Jika sungguh apa yang tersebar neh tuduhan, sila nafikan gunakan hujah2 konkrit kerana kita sebagai rakyat akan menilai hujah2 penafian dari kesemua pihak2 yang terbabit.
SUMBER

DISCLAIMER

Blog ini tidak bertanggungjawab terhadap komentar yang diutarakan melalui ruangan ini. Ia pandangan peribadi pemilik akaun dan tidak semestinya menggambarkan pendirian blog ini. Segala risiko akibat komen yang disiarkan menjadi tanggungjawab pemilik akaun sendiri. Penulis tidak memaksa anda memasuki blog ini dan tidak akan bertanggungjawab jika ada yang tercedera atau tersinggung emosi, atau disaman jika melanggar akta mesin cetak dan lain-lain undang-undang yang berkaitan. Segala caci maki, kutukan, fitnah adalah antara anda dengan ALLAH Azza Wa'jal. Berilah komen dan kritikan yang membina. Insyallah kami akan cuba membalas komen-komen anda.